The Meaning of the 1980s’ Anti-Politics’ Legacy within the Contemporary East-Central European Civil Societies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i3.103Abstract
Drawing on the framing perspective in the study of social movements, the article discusses the possible links between the concept of anti-politics developed by Czech, Hungarian, and Polish dissidents in the 1970s and 1980s, and formal and informal initiatives of the East-Central European civil societies nowadays. It is argued that the historic notion of anti-politics should be applied in the contemporary research on social movements and on any other form of civil activism in the region since it has immense analytical and methodological importance. It allows researchers to recognize different traits of social activity and civil society specific to East-Central Europe, and explain them in a more comprehensive manner. Referring to the historical concept of anti-politics enables the researchers to identify and appreciate characteristic regional discourses, repertoires, and forms of protest in historical and contemporary social movements and to perceive the continuity between them. It also helps identify the mechanism of civil activism. The article’s argument is based on the writings of three dissident movement leaders, namely Vaclav Havel, György Konrád, and Jacek Kuroń. It is being explained how the concept of anti-politics worked as a collective action frame in the 1980s, and the examples of its legacies within the contemporary formal and informal civil activism are given.
References
Primary Sources
Havel, V. and Keane, J. (1985) The Power of the Powerless: Citizens Against the State in Central-Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc.
Havel, V. (1987a) The Power of the Powerless. In Vladislav, J. (ed.) Václav Havel or Living in Truth. Twenty-two Essays Published on the Occasion of the Award of the Erasmus Prize to Václav Havel. London: Faber and Faber.
Havel, V. (1987b) Politics and Conscience. In Vladislav, J. (ed.) Václav Havel or Living in Truth. Twenty-two Essays Published on the Occasion of the Award of the Erasmus Prize to Václav Havel. London: Faber and Faber.
Konrád, G. (1987) Antipolitics. New York: Henry Holt.
Kuroń, J. (1977) Document on Contemporary Poland: Reflections on a Program of Action. Polish Review, 22 (3): 51-69.
Kuroń, J. (1984) Polityka i odpowiedzialność (Politics and Responsibility). London: Aneks.
Kuroń, J. and Modzelewski, K. (1982) Solidarność: The Missing Link? The Classic Open Letter to the Party. London: Bookmarks.
Michnik, A. (1976) A New Evolutionism. Survey, 22 (3-4): 267-271.
References
Benford, R. and Snow, D. A. (2000) Framing Process and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–639.
Bielesiak, J. (2015) The Paradox of Solidarity’s Legacy: Contested Values in Poland’s Transitional Politics. In Rychard, A. and Gabriel, M. (eds.) The Legacy of Polish Solidarity. Social Activism, Regime Collapse, and Building of a New Society. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 67-96.
Blokker, P. (2011) Dissidence, Republicanism, and Democratic Change. East European Politics and Societies, 25 (2): 219-243.
Blokker, P. (2012) A Political Sociology of European ‘Anti-Politics‘ and Dissent. Cambio, 2 (4): 1-22.
Bozóki, A. (1996) Intellectuals in a New Democracy: The Democratic Charter in Hungary. East European Politics and Societies, 10 (2):173-213.
Brier, R. (2009) The Roots of the ‘Fourth Republic’: Solidarity’s Cultural Legacy to Polish Politics. East European Politics and Societies, 23 (1): 63-85.
Ciżewska, E. (2010) Filozofia publiczna Solidarności (The Public Philosophy of Solidarity). Warsaw: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
Cohen, J. L. and Arato, A. (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (2006) Social Movements. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Falk, B. (2003) The Dilemmas of Dissidence in East-Central Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Falk, B. (2011) Resistance and Dissent in Central and Eastern Europe. An Emerging Historiography. East European Politics and Societies, 25 (2): 318-360.
Fisher, W. F. (1997) Doing Good? The Politics and Antipolitics of NGO Practices. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26: 439-464.
Gamson, W.A. (1992) The Social Psychology of Collective Action. In Morris A. and McClurg, M. C. (eds.) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gamson, W. A. (1995) Constructing Social Protest. In Johnston, H. and Klandermans, B. (eds.) Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 85-106.
Gawin, D. (2013) Wielki zwrot. Ewolucja lewicy i odrodzenie idei społeczeństwa obywatelskiego 1956-1976 (A Great Return. The Evolution of the Left and the Revival of the Idea of Civil Society 1956-1976 ). Krakow: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Gazurová, S. (2011) Wezwanie do odnowy moralnej życia społecznego w wypowiedziach Václava Havla. (A Call to a Moral Renewal in Vaclav Havel’s Speeches). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Glenn III, J.K. (2001) Framing Democracy. Civil Society and Civic Movements in Eastern Europe. Standford: Standford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of the Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.
Górski, R. (2007) Bez państwa : demokracja uczestnicząca w działaniu (The State without Participatory Democracy in Action) . Krakow : Wydawnictwo i Księgarnia Korporacja Ha!art.
Horn, M. (1990) Campaign Carnival: A Velvet Election. The New Republic, 203 (6): 11-13.
Ivancheva, M. (2007) Civil Society as a Discursive Frame: Vaclav Havel’s Anatomy of Reticence as a Case Study, unpublished MA thesis www.etd.ceu.hu/2007/ivancheva_mariya.pdf Accessed 07-06-2015.
Ivancheva, M. (2011) The Role of Dissident Intellectuals in the Formation of Civil Society in (Post)socialist East-Central Europe. In Kouki, H. and Romanos, E. (eds.) Protest Beyond Borders: Contentious Politics in Europe since 1945. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Jezierska, K. (2014) Apolitical and Non-Ideological? Polish Civil Society without Identity. Paper presented at the ESA RN 36 Midterm conference. October 16-18, Gdańsk.
Johnston, H. (1995) A Methodology for Frame Analysis: From Discourse to Cognitive Schema. In Johnston, H. and Klandermans, B. (eds.) Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 217-246.
Johnston, H. (2002) Verification and Proof in Frame and Discourse Analysis. In Klandermans, B. and Staggenborg, S. (eds.) Methods of Social Movements Research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 62-91.
Jurczyszyn, Ł. et al. (eds.) (2014) Obywatele ACTA (ACTA Citizens ). Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności, ZARS.
Kubik, J. (2015) Solidarity’s Afterlife: Amidst Forgetting and Bickering. In Rychard, A. and Motzkin, G. (eds.) The Legacy of Polish Solidarity. Social Activism, Regime Collapse, and Building of a New Society. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 161-202.
Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1996) Problems in Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Postcommunist Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Matynia, E. (2009) Performative Democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
O’Dwyer, C. (2014), Remembering, Not Commemorating, 1989: The Twenty-Year Anniversary of the Velvet Revolution in the Czech Republic. In Bernhardt, M. and Kubik, J. (eds.), Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 171-192.
Ost, D. (1990) Solidarity and the Politics of Anti-politics. Philadelphia: Temple U.P.
Ost, D. (2005) The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Payerhin, M. and Zirkakzadeh, C.E. (2006) On Movement Frames and Negotiated Identities: The Case of Poland’s First Solidarity Congress, Social Movement Studies, 5 (2), 91-115.
Rychard, A. (2015) Solidarity: Its Evolution and Legacy. How Did It Happen That a Populist Povement Introduced the Market Economy and Democracy?. In Rychard, A. and Motzkin, G. (eds.), The Legacy of Polish Solidarity. Social Activism, Regime Collapse, and Building of a New Society. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 96-113.
Snow, D. A (2004) Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields. In: Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Wiley, 380-412.
Snow, D. A., Rochford Jr., E. B., Worden, S. K. and Benford, R. D. (1986) Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation, American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 464-481.
Steinberg, M. W. (1998) Tilting the Frame: Considerations on Collective Action Framing from a Discursive Turn. Theory and Society, 27 (6): 845-872.
Stokes, G. (1993) The Walls Came Tumbking Down: The Collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swidler, A. (1986) Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51: 273-86.
Szabó, A. and Mikecz, D. (2015) After the Orbán-Revolution: The Awakening of Civil Society in Hungary? In Pleyers, G. and Sava, I. N. (eds.) Social Movements in Central and Eastern Europe: A Renewal of Protests and Democracy. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Editorial. 34-43.
Szacki, J. (1995) Liberalism after Communism. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work three months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. This acknowledgement is not automatic, it should be asked from the editors and can usually be obtained one year after its first publication in the journal.
