We are civil society!

Strategic practice used by the Croatian Feminist Movement to address the controversy around the right to abortion as a response to growing conservatism

Authors

  • Ludmila Böhmová Charles University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v10i2.1273
Abstract Views: 118 PDF Downloads: 93

Keywords:

post-socialist civil society, strategic practice, feminist movement, Croatia, right to abortion

Abstract

The study expands on the current debate about post-socialist civil society and social movements, specifically in Croatia. Taking the strategic practices of the Croatian feminist movement in relation to the right to abortion in the last decade as the research unit, it employs the conception of post-socialist civil societies, focuses on the practices of civil society, and differentiates between contentious and compliant practices regardless of the form of organisation or engagement. The study examines whether the strategic practices of the Croatian feminist movement have changed in the last decade and, if so, which factors have played the most significant role. The study is based on a critical content analysis of interviews with the actors themselves and draws on their interpretations of the strategic practices. It finds that the Croatian feminist movement has, in the last decade, rethought the dominant compliant strategic practices inherent in the nonprofit sector and the organisations within it and has turned more towards contentious practices. The research described in the paper finds that there are three dominant factors behind the rethinking of the strategic practice: two external – the growing prominence of the conservative movement and the new expected abortion law – and one internal: a generational shift.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-16

How to Cite

[1]
Böhmová, L. 2024. We are civil society! : Strategic practice used by the Croatian Feminist Movement to address the controversy around the right to abortion as a response to growing conservatism. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics. 10, 2 (Oct. 2024), 132–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v10i2.1273.